Review




Structured Review

Hello Bio Inc par2 agonist peptide sligrl nh2
P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the <t>PAR2</t> agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).
Par2 Agonist Peptide Sligrl Nh2, supplied by Hello Bio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/par2+agonist+peptide+sligrl+nh2/pmc12554998-48-46-52?v=Hello+Bio+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
par2 agonist peptide sligrl nh2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Protease‐Activated Receptor 2 Activation Provokes an Increase in Intracellular Calcium and Serotonin Secretion in a Human Enteroendocrine Cell Line"

Article Title: Protease‐Activated Receptor 2 Activation Provokes an Increase in Intracellular Calcium and Serotonin Secretion in a Human Enteroendocrine Cell Line

Journal: Cell Biochemistry and Function

doi: 10.1002/cbf.70132

P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the PAR2 agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).
Figure Legend Snippet: P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the PAR2 agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).

Techniques Used: Concentration Assay, Inhibition, Incubation, Fluorescence, Two Tailed Test

PAR2 activation does not desensitize P‐STS cells against activation with histamine or ACh. (a–c) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition of trypsin (final concentration 150 nM) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells, followed by addition of a) medium ( n = 11, in three experiments the reaction to trypsin was delayed (open circles), (b) histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 8) or c) ACh (final concentration 0.1 µM, n = 6) 110 s later without trypsin removal. (d) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I experiments with immediate reaction to trypsin, including the experiments shown in a–c and an additional experiment with ACh added to a final concentration of 0.25 µM. (e and f) Cells activated by trypsin (150 nM) can respond to histamine (e, final concentration 10 µM) or Ach (f, final concentration 0.25 µM) added 110 s after trypsin.
Figure Legend Snippet: PAR2 activation does not desensitize P‐STS cells against activation with histamine or ACh. (a–c) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition of trypsin (final concentration 150 nM) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells, followed by addition of a) medium ( n = 11, in three experiments the reaction to trypsin was delayed (open circles), (b) histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 8) or c) ACh (final concentration 0.1 µM, n = 6) 110 s later without trypsin removal. (d) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I experiments with immediate reaction to trypsin, including the experiments shown in a–c and an additional experiment with ACh added to a final concentration of 0.25 µM. (e and f) Cells activated by trypsin (150 nM) can respond to histamine (e, final concentration 10 µM) or Ach (f, final concentration 0.25 µM) added 110 s after trypsin.

Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Concentration Assay

Activation with histamine does not desensitize P‐STS cells against PAR2 activation. (a) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 11) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells. In 3 experiments the reaction to histamine was delayed (open circles). (b) Cells activated by histamine (10 µM) can respond to trypsin (e, final concentration 150 nM) added 110 s after histamine, which was still present.
Figure Legend Snippet: Activation with histamine does not desensitize P‐STS cells against PAR2 activation. (a) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 11) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells. In 3 experiments the reaction to histamine was delayed (open circles). (b) Cells activated by histamine (10 µM) can respond to trypsin (e, final concentration 150 nM) added 110 s after histamine, which was still present.

Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Concentration Assay



Similar Products

94
MedChemExpress par2 agonist peptide sligrl nh2
P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the <t>PAR2</t> agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as <t>SLIGRL‐NH2).</t> (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).
Par2 Agonist Peptide Sligrl Nh2, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/par2+agonist+peptide+sligrl+nh2/pmc12554998-48-46-60?v=MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
par2 agonist peptide sligrl nh2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Hello Bio Inc par2 agonist peptide sligrl nh2
P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the <t>PAR2</t> agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).
Par2 Agonist Peptide Sligrl Nh2, supplied by Hello Bio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/par2+agonist+peptide+sligrl+nh2/pmc12554998-48-46-52?v=Hello+Bio+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
par2 agonist peptide sligrl nh2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GenScript corporation par2 agonist peptide sligrl-nh2
P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the <t>PAR2</t> agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).
Par2 Agonist Peptide Sligrl Nh2, supplied by GenScript corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/par2+agonist+peptide+sligrl+nh2/pm38637276-68-8-16?v=GenScript+corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
par2 agonist peptide sligrl-nh2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Tocris par2 agonist peptide ap sligrl nh 2
P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the <t>PAR2</t> agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).
Par2 Agonist Peptide Ap Sligrl Nh 2, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/par2+agonist+peptide+sligrl+nh2/pmc10703791-162-1-11?v=Tocris
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
par2 agonist peptide ap sligrl nh 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Tocris par2 agonist peptide ap sligrl nh2
P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the <t>PAR2</t> agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).
Par2 Agonist Peptide Ap Sligrl Nh2, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/par2+agonist+peptide+sligrl+nh2/ppr0656331-85-1-10?v=Tocris
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
par2 agonist peptide ap sligrl nh2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Tocris par2 peptide agonist sligrl nh2
P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the <t>PAR2</t> agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).
Par2 Peptide Agonist Sligrl Nh2, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/par2+agonist+peptide+sligrl+nh2/pm35487308-185-18-22?v=Tocris
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
par2 peptide agonist sligrl nh2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Bachem par2 agonist peptide sligrl-nh2
P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the <t>PAR2</t> agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).
Par2 Agonist Peptide Sligrl Nh2, supplied by Bachem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/par2+agonist+peptide+sligrl+nh2/pm32860953-50-7-13?v=Bachem
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
par2 agonist peptide sligrl-nh2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Millipore par2 agonist peptide following sequence ser-leu-ile-gly-arg-leu-amide (sligrl-nh2
P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the <t>PAR2</t> agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).
Par2 Agonist Peptide Following Sequence Ser Leu Ile Gly Arg Leu Amide (Sligrl Nh2, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/par2+agonist+peptide+sligrl+nh2/pmc02504502-60-23-26?v=Millipore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
par2 agonist peptide following sequence ser-leu-ile-gly-arg-leu-amide (sligrl-nh2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the PAR2 agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).

Journal: Cell Biochemistry and Function

Article Title: Protease‐Activated Receptor 2 Activation Provokes an Increase in Intracellular Calcium and Serotonin Secretion in a Human Enteroendocrine Cell Line

doi: 10.1002/cbf.70132

Figure Lengend Snippet: P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the PAR2 agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).

Article Snippet: ACh chloride, G‐418 sulfate solution, histamine dihydrochloride, hydrogen peroxide (30% w/w with stabilizers, freshly diluted before use) and nifedipine were from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA); mibefradil dihydrochloride was from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, United Kingdom); Gibco trypsin‐EDTA (0.05%) was from Thermo Fisher (Schwerte, Germany); the PAR2 agonist peptide SLIGRL‐NH2 was from HelloBio (Dunshaughlin, Ireland); I‐191 and PAR2‐IN‐1 were from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, USA); Fluo‐4AM was from AAT Bioquest (Pleasanton, California, USA); rabbit anti‐phospho‐p38 antibody (Thr 180/Tyr 182) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, Texas, USA); mouse anti‐human RelA/NF‐κB p65 (clone 532301) was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Canada), goat Alexa Fluor 488‐labeled secondary fluorescent antibodies were from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, California, USA) and the serotonin Elisa kit was from ImmuSmol (Bordeaux, France).

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Inhibition, Incubation, Fluorescence, Two Tailed Test

PAR2 activation does not desensitize P‐STS cells against activation with histamine or ACh. (a–c) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition of trypsin (final concentration 150 nM) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells, followed by addition of a) medium ( n = 11, in three experiments the reaction to trypsin was delayed (open circles), (b) histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 8) or c) ACh (final concentration 0.1 µM, n = 6) 110 s later without trypsin removal. (d) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I experiments with immediate reaction to trypsin, including the experiments shown in a–c and an additional experiment with ACh added to a final concentration of 0.25 µM. (e and f) Cells activated by trypsin (150 nM) can respond to histamine (e, final concentration 10 µM) or Ach (f, final concentration 0.25 µM) added 110 s after trypsin.

Journal: Cell Biochemistry and Function

Article Title: Protease‐Activated Receptor 2 Activation Provokes an Increase in Intracellular Calcium and Serotonin Secretion in a Human Enteroendocrine Cell Line

doi: 10.1002/cbf.70132

Figure Lengend Snippet: PAR2 activation does not desensitize P‐STS cells against activation with histamine or ACh. (a–c) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition of trypsin (final concentration 150 nM) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells, followed by addition of a) medium ( n = 11, in three experiments the reaction to trypsin was delayed (open circles), (b) histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 8) or c) ACh (final concentration 0.1 µM, n = 6) 110 s later without trypsin removal. (d) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I experiments with immediate reaction to trypsin, including the experiments shown in a–c and an additional experiment with ACh added to a final concentration of 0.25 µM. (e and f) Cells activated by trypsin (150 nM) can respond to histamine (e, final concentration 10 µM) or Ach (f, final concentration 0.25 µM) added 110 s after trypsin.

Article Snippet: ACh chloride, G‐418 sulfate solution, histamine dihydrochloride, hydrogen peroxide (30% w/w with stabilizers, freshly diluted before use) and nifedipine were from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA); mibefradil dihydrochloride was from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, United Kingdom); Gibco trypsin‐EDTA (0.05%) was from Thermo Fisher (Schwerte, Germany); the PAR2 agonist peptide SLIGRL‐NH2 was from HelloBio (Dunshaughlin, Ireland); I‐191 and PAR2‐IN‐1 were from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, USA); Fluo‐4AM was from AAT Bioquest (Pleasanton, California, USA); rabbit anti‐phospho‐p38 antibody (Thr 180/Tyr 182) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, Texas, USA); mouse anti‐human RelA/NF‐κB p65 (clone 532301) was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Canada), goat Alexa Fluor 488‐labeled secondary fluorescent antibodies were from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, California, USA) and the serotonin Elisa kit was from ImmuSmol (Bordeaux, France).

Techniques: Activation Assay, Concentration Assay

Activation with histamine does not desensitize P‐STS cells against PAR2 activation. (a) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 11) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells. In 3 experiments the reaction to histamine was delayed (open circles). (b) Cells activated by histamine (10 µM) can respond to trypsin (e, final concentration 150 nM) added 110 s after histamine, which was still present.

Journal: Cell Biochemistry and Function

Article Title: Protease‐Activated Receptor 2 Activation Provokes an Increase in Intracellular Calcium and Serotonin Secretion in a Human Enteroendocrine Cell Line

doi: 10.1002/cbf.70132

Figure Lengend Snippet: Activation with histamine does not desensitize P‐STS cells against PAR2 activation. (a) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 11) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells. In 3 experiments the reaction to histamine was delayed (open circles). (b) Cells activated by histamine (10 µM) can respond to trypsin (e, final concentration 150 nM) added 110 s after histamine, which was still present.

Article Snippet: ACh chloride, G‐418 sulfate solution, histamine dihydrochloride, hydrogen peroxide (30% w/w with stabilizers, freshly diluted before use) and nifedipine were from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA); mibefradil dihydrochloride was from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, United Kingdom); Gibco trypsin‐EDTA (0.05%) was from Thermo Fisher (Schwerte, Germany); the PAR2 agonist peptide SLIGRL‐NH2 was from HelloBio (Dunshaughlin, Ireland); I‐191 and PAR2‐IN‐1 were from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, USA); Fluo‐4AM was from AAT Bioquest (Pleasanton, California, USA); rabbit anti‐phospho‐p38 antibody (Thr 180/Tyr 182) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, Texas, USA); mouse anti‐human RelA/NF‐κB p65 (clone 532301) was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Canada), goat Alexa Fluor 488‐labeled secondary fluorescent antibodies were from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, California, USA) and the serotonin Elisa kit was from ImmuSmol (Bordeaux, France).

Techniques: Activation Assay, Concentration Assay

P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the PAR2 agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).

Journal: Cell Biochemistry and Function

Article Title: Protease‐Activated Receptor 2 Activation Provokes an Increase in Intracellular Calcium and Serotonin Secretion in a Human Enteroendocrine Cell Line

doi: 10.1002/cbf.70132

Figure Lengend Snippet: P‐STS cells respond with an increase in [Ca 2+ ] i to the PAR2 agonist SLIGRL‐NH 2. (a) [Ca 2+ ] i responses to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (time courses of individual experiments are shown, n = 8). (b) The PAR2 antagonist I‐191 inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 (10 µM) while PAR2‐IN‐1 has no inhibitory effect ( n = 4 for each inhibitor concentration, medium as well as SLIGRL‐NH2). (c) I‐191 also inhibits the [Ca 2+ ] i response to trypsin (110 nM, n = 12). (d) Inhibition of the [Ca 2+ ] i response to SLIGRL‐NH 2 and trypsin by pre‐incubation (5 min) with I‐191 (same experiments as shown in b and c). Relative increase in fluorescence 40 s (trypsin) or 50 s (SLIGRL‐NH 2 ) after addition of agonist. * p < 0.05 (two‐tailed binominal test).

Article Snippet: ACh chloride, G‐418 sulfate solution, histamine dihydrochloride, hydrogen peroxide (30% w/w with stabilizers, freshly diluted before use) and nifedipine were from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA); mibefradil dihydrochloride was from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, United Kingdom); Gibco trypsin‐EDTA (0.05%) was from Thermo Fisher (Schwerte, Germany); the PAR2 agonist peptide SLIGRL‐NH2 was from HelloBio (Dunshaughlin, Ireland); I‐191 and PAR2‐IN‐1 were from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, USA); Fluo‐4AM was from AAT Bioquest (Pleasanton, California, USA); rabbit anti‐phospho‐p38 antibody (Thr 180/Tyr 182) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, Texas, USA); mouse anti‐human RelA/NF‐κB p65 (clone 532301) was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Canada), goat Alexa Fluor 488‐labeled secondary fluorescent antibodies were from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, California, USA) and the serotonin Elisa kit was from ImmuSmol (Bordeaux, France).

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Inhibition, Incubation, Fluorescence, Two Tailed Test

PAR2 activation does not desensitize P‐STS cells against activation with histamine or ACh. (a–c) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition of trypsin (final concentration 150 nM) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells, followed by addition of a) medium ( n = 11, in three experiments the reaction to trypsin was delayed (open circles), (b) histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 8) or c) ACh (final concentration 0.1 µM, n = 6) 110 s later without trypsin removal. (d) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I experiments with immediate reaction to trypsin, including the experiments shown in a–c and an additional experiment with ACh added to a final concentration of 0.25 µM. (e and f) Cells activated by trypsin (150 nM) can respond to histamine (e, final concentration 10 µM) or Ach (f, final concentration 0.25 µM) added 110 s after trypsin.

Journal: Cell Biochemistry and Function

Article Title: Protease‐Activated Receptor 2 Activation Provokes an Increase in Intracellular Calcium and Serotonin Secretion in a Human Enteroendocrine Cell Line

doi: 10.1002/cbf.70132

Figure Lengend Snippet: PAR2 activation does not desensitize P‐STS cells against activation with histamine or ACh. (a–c) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition of trypsin (final concentration 150 nM) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells, followed by addition of a) medium ( n = 11, in three experiments the reaction to trypsin was delayed (open circles), (b) histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 8) or c) ACh (final concentration 0.1 µM, n = 6) 110 s later without trypsin removal. (d) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I experiments with immediate reaction to trypsin, including the experiments shown in a–c and an additional experiment with ACh added to a final concentration of 0.25 µM. (e and f) Cells activated by trypsin (150 nM) can respond to histamine (e, final concentration 10 µM) or Ach (f, final concentration 0.25 µM) added 110 s after trypsin.

Article Snippet: ACh chloride, G‐418 sulfate solution, histamine dihydrochloride, hydrogen peroxide (30% w/w with stabilizers, freshly diluted before use) and nifedipine were from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA); mibefradil dihydrochloride was from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, United Kingdom); Gibco trypsin‐EDTA (0.05%) was from Thermo Fisher (Schwerte, Germany); the PAR2 agonist peptide SLIGRL‐NH2 was from HelloBio (Dunshaughlin, Ireland); I‐191 and PAR2‐IN‐1 were from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, USA); Fluo‐4AM was from AAT Bioquest (Pleasanton, California, USA); rabbit anti‐phospho‐p38 antibody (Thr 180/Tyr 182) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, Texas, USA); mouse anti‐human RelA/NF‐κB p65 (clone 532301) was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Canada), goat Alexa Fluor 488‐labeled secondary fluorescent antibodies were from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, California, USA) and the serotonin Elisa kit was from ImmuSmol (Bordeaux, France).

Techniques: Activation Assay, Concentration Assay

Activation with histamine does not desensitize P‐STS cells against PAR2 activation. (a) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 11) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells. In 3 experiments the reaction to histamine was delayed (open circles). (b) Cells activated by histamine (10 µM) can respond to trypsin (e, final concentration 150 nM) added 110 s after histamine, which was still present.

Journal: Cell Biochemistry and Function

Article Title: Protease‐Activated Receptor 2 Activation Provokes an Increase in Intracellular Calcium and Serotonin Secretion in a Human Enteroendocrine Cell Line

doi: 10.1002/cbf.70132

Figure Lengend Snippet: Activation with histamine does not desensitize P‐STS cells against PAR2 activation. (a) Time courses of [Ca 2+ ] I in different experiments after addition histamine (final concentration 10 µM, n = 11) to Fluo4‐AM‐labelled cells. In 3 experiments the reaction to histamine was delayed (open circles). (b) Cells activated by histamine (10 µM) can respond to trypsin (e, final concentration 150 nM) added 110 s after histamine, which was still present.

Article Snippet: ACh chloride, G‐418 sulfate solution, histamine dihydrochloride, hydrogen peroxide (30% w/w with stabilizers, freshly diluted before use) and nifedipine were from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA); mibefradil dihydrochloride was from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, United Kingdom); Gibco trypsin‐EDTA (0.05%) was from Thermo Fisher (Schwerte, Germany); the PAR2 agonist peptide SLIGRL‐NH2 was from HelloBio (Dunshaughlin, Ireland); I‐191 and PAR2‐IN‐1 were from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, USA); Fluo‐4AM was from AAT Bioquest (Pleasanton, California, USA); rabbit anti‐phospho‐p38 antibody (Thr 180/Tyr 182) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, Texas, USA); mouse anti‐human RelA/NF‐κB p65 (clone 532301) was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Canada), goat Alexa Fluor 488‐labeled secondary fluorescent antibodies were from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, California, USA) and the serotonin Elisa kit was from ImmuSmol (Bordeaux, France).

Techniques: Activation Assay, Concentration Assay